superdecipher
Curious0 XP
Mental models

First Principles

Strip a problem down to what is undeniably true, then rebuild it from there.

What do I know for certain?

Most thinking is copying

When we face a problem we usually reason by analogy: we look at how it was done before, then make a small change. It is fast and mostly fine. It also quietly carries along every assumption the original made.

First principles thinking throws out the copy. You break the problem down to the things you know are true, things you could not argue with, and build a solution back up from only those.

A cook follows a recipe. A chef knows why heat, salt, fat and acid behave as they do, so they can invent a dish nobody has written down yet.

Take the phone apart and tap every part

Why does a phone cost ₹40,000?

Analogy says “because phones cost that much”. Let’s check what it is actually made of.

The three moves

Spot the assumptions

List everything you are taking for granted about the problem, especially the things “everyone knows”.

Dig to bedrock

Keep asking “why?” until you reach something that can’t be broken down further: physics, maths, human nature, a hard limit.

Rebuild

Design a solution using only the bedrock, ignoring how it is usually done. Then test it.

Same problem, two kinds of thinking

A school wants to cut what parents spend on textbooks. Switch between the two approaches.

  1. Other schools negotiated a bulk discount with the publisher.
  2. Let’s do the same and ask for 15% off.
  3. Result: books cost ₹4,250 instead of ₹5,000. Same books, same model.

Look at both approaches